CA InterGST › Ch 2

Supply under GST

Goods and Services Tax Paper 3, Sec B ~25 min revision Sec 7 & 8Schedules I–IIIDefinitions

AI-assisted · review in progress · last updated 25 July 2026 · jump to quick revision

In 30 seconds

  1. Supply is THE taxable event under GST — it replaces manufacture, sale, service, purchase and entry into territory as the trigger for tax.
  2. Section 7's 3-parameter test (GCB): Goods/services form + Consideration + course/furtherance of Business — with Schedule I overriding 'no consideration' and 7(1)(b) import of services overriding 'no business nexus'.
  3. Schedule I deems 4 supplies without consideration (BAD-I); Schedule II only classifies an established supply as goods or services; Schedule III is the negative list.
  4. Section 8: composite supply (naturally bundled, one principal supply) is taxed at the principal supply's rate; mixed supply (single price, not bundled) at the highest rate — always test composite first.
  5. Schedule III always wins — 'notwithstanding sub-section (1)' — so it is the final filter in every supply-determination question.
Quick-revision mode is on. Prose is hidden — definitions, key lists and tables only.

Based on GST law as on 30.04.2025 (May 2026 exams onwards). Section numbers are CGST Act unless stated.

How the chapter fits together

Under GST the taxable event is “supply” — it replaces the old triggers of manufacture, sale, service, purchase and entry into territory. Section 7 gives supply a 3-parameter test (GCB mnemonic): Goods/services form + Consideration + course/furtherance of Business. Every supply question then walks one pipeline:

Key points
  • 7(1)(a) supply for consideration in course/furtherance of business →
  • 7(1)(aa) entity ↔ its members/constituents for consideration →
  • 7(1)(b) import of services for consideration →
  • 7(1)(c) + Schedule I deemed supply without consideration →
  • 7(1A) + Schedule II classify as goods or services →
  • 7(2) + Schedule III non-supply negative list → 7(3) Govt reclassification power.

The flowchart filter comes last, always: even if all 3 parameters are met, check Schedule III / 7(2)(b) — if the transaction is covered there, it is not a supply. The negative list overrides everything.

Scope of supply — Section 7

Section 7(1)(a) lists the forms of supply — sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease, disposal — but the words “includes”/“such as” make the list inclusive, NOT exhaustive.

Section 7(1)(aa) taxes supplies between a person (other than an individual) and its members or constituents for consideration. Its non-obstante Explanation deems them two separate persons, overriding the doctrine of mutuality (it overrules the Calcutta Club case).

Section 7(1)(b) — import of services for consideration — is the only exception to the business condition: taxable even if for personal use.

ProvisionCoversCrux
7(1)(a)Supply for consideration + businessIllustrative forms (sale/transfer/barter/exchange/licence/rental/lease/disposal); inclusive — “includes”, “such as”
7(1)(aa)Entity ↔ members/constituentsFor consideration; non-obstante Explanation deems 2 persons; overrides mutuality doctrine
7(1)(b)Import of servicesConsideration required; business nexus NOT required — sole exception to business condition
7(1)(c)Deemed supply without considerationOnly if in Schedule I (4 paras only)
7(1A)Classify as goods/servicesSchedule II — applies only after supply is established under 7(1)
7(2)(a)Non-supply — Schedule IIINegative list; “notwithstanding sub-section (1)” — overrides 7(1) entirely
7(2)(b)Non-supply — Govt notifiedCentral/State Govt or local authority as public authorities, notified activities
7(3)Govt reclassification powerNotify a transaction as goods-not-service or vice versa; subject to (1), (1A), (2)

Notified non-supplies under 7(2)(b): functions of a Panchayat (Art 243G) and Municipality (Art 243W), and the grant of alcoholic liquor licence by a State Government (fee-based). This carve-out has no precedent value for other licences — mining rights, spectrum and the like are taxable, with RCM applying.

Key definitions

Definition

Goods [Sec 2(52)]

Movable property excluding money and securities; including actionable claims, growing crops, grass, and things attached to land agreed to be severed. Trap: actionable claim = goods; land-attached items are goods only if severed before/under the supply contract.

Definition

Services [Sec 2(102)]

Anything other than goods, money and securities — including a money conversion activity with separate consideration and facilitating securities transactions. Mere money conversion without separate consideration is not a service.

Definition

Consideration [Sec 2(31)]

Payment (in money or otherwise) or the monetary value of an act/forbearance — by the recipient or a third party; excludes Government subsidy. A deposit is not consideration unless applied as such, and a donation needs quid pro quo.

Definition

Specified actionable claim [Sec 2(102A)]

Betting, casinos, gambling, horse racing, lottery, and online money gaming. Only these actionable claims are supply — all others fall in Schedule III Para 6 as non-supply.

The rest of the definitions sheet, with the trap column examiners draw MCQs from:

TermCrisp meaningTrap / keyword
Principal [2(88)]Person on whose behalf an agent carries on supply/receipt businessNot to be confused with “principal supply” [2(90)]
Principal supply [2(90)]Predominant element of a composite supply; others ancillaryNot “Principal” [2(88)]
Competent authority [2(29)]Notified by GovtSch II Para 5(b) has extended meaning (architect/CE/surveyor)
Family [2(49)]Spouse + children (always) + parents/grandparents/siblings ONLY IF wholly/mainly dependentNon-dependent sibling/parent ≠ family (Raman/Shriniti trap)
Government [2(53)]Central Govt onlyState laws define separately
Local authority [2(69)]Panchayat, Municipality, Municipal Committee/Zilla Parishad/District Board, Cantonment Board, Regional/District Council (6th Sch), Dev Board (Art 371/371J), Regional Council (Art 371A)7 limbs (a)–(g)
Actionable claim [2(1) + TP Act s.3]Claim to unsecured debt / beneficial interest in movable property not in possessionOnly “specified” ones taxable; rest = Sch III Para 6 non-supply
Manufacture [2(72)]New product — distinct name + character + use (ALL 3)
Money [2(75)]Legal tender, cheque, DD, PPI etc. used to settle an obligationExcludes currency held for numismatic value; PPIs = money
Taxable supply [2(108)]Supply leviable to tax
Supplier [2(105)]Person supplying + agent acting on his behalf; platform owner = deemed supplier for specified actionable claims
Recipient [2(93)]3 limbs: consideration payer / goods receiver (no consideration) / service receiver (no consideration)Includes agent of recipient
Person [2(84)]12 categories: individual, HUF, company, firm, LLP, AOP/BOI, corporation, foreign body corporate, co-op society, local authority, Govt, society, trust, artificial juridical person
Works contract [2(119)]Contract for building/construction etc. of IMMOVABLE property involving transfer of property in goodsImmovable property ONLY
Exempt supply [2(47)]Nil-rated / wholly exempt (s.11 CGST / s.6 IGST); includes non-taxable supply
Related persons (Expl. to s.15)Officers/directors of each other, legal partners, employer–employee, ≥25% shareholding control, control relationships, family, sole agent/distributor/concessionaireBasis for Sch I Para 2
Distinct persons [s.25(4)/(5)]Separate GST registrations (same/different State) of the same PANBasis for Sch I Para 2; branch-transfer trap

Schedule I — supply without consideration

Only 4 paras — don’t invent a fifth. Mnemonic: BAD-IBusiness asset permanent transfer (ITC availed), Agent–Principal goods, Distinct/related persons, Import of service from a related person.

ParaDeemed supplyCarve-out / condition
1Permanent transfer of business assetsOnly if ITC availed; ITC blocked or eligible-but-not-availed = no supply
2Supply between related/distinct persons, in course/furtherance of businessEmployer→employee gifts ≤ ₹50,000 per FY excluded; above ₹50,000 = supply
3Principal–Agent supply of goodsGOODS only (not services); invoice-name test — invoice in agent’s own name = covered; in principal’s name = not covered
4Import of service from related person / other establishmentWithout consideration, but business nexus required

Contrast the two import routes: 7(1)(b) has consideration present, needs no business nexus, and is always supply; Schedule I Para 4 has no consideration but needs a related person AND business nexus.

Distinct persons trap: stock transfer between the same PAN with separate registrations (even in the same State) = supply; the same PAN under a single registration (different places of business under one GSTIN) = not supply.

Principal–Agent (goods only): the invoicing test alone decides Para 3 — agent invoices in his own name = covered; in the principal’s name = not covered; disclosure of the principal’s name is immaterial. Knock-on effect for a DCA: if he is a Para 3 agent, his interest on delayed payment is included in the value of goods (s.15(2)(d)); if not, the interest is an independent exempt service supply.

Schedule II and Schedule III

Schedule II does not create supply — it only classifies an already-established supply as goods or services. One-line mnemonic: “Title moves = Goods; only use moves = Services.”

ParaTransactionClassification
1TransferTitle = Goods; right without title = Services; hire purchase / sale-or-return = Goods
2Land & buildingLease/tenancy/easement/letting = Services
3Treatment/processOn another’s goods (job work) = Services
4Business assetsPrivate use = Services; disposal (no longer a business asset) = Goods; cessation = Goods — exceptions: (i) going concern, (ii) business carried on by personal representative deemed taxable person
5(a)–(f)Various servicesRenting; construction (except post-CC/first occupation); temporary IPR transfer; IT software; tolerate/refrain/do; right to use goods — all = Services
6Composite deemedWorks contract + restaurant/food service = Services, legislatively fixed — no natural-bundling test needed

Schedule III is the negative list — 10 paras, of which 7 and 8 are out of the Inter syllabus:

ParaNon-supplyWatch for
1Employee → employer servicesIn course of employment
2Court/Tribunal servicesIncl. District/High/Supreme Court
3Constitutional-post dutiesMP/MLA/Panchayat/Municipality members, President/VP/PM/Governors/CJI/Speaker/CEC/CAG/UPSC Chairman/AG
4Funeral/burial/crematorium/mortuaryIncludes transport of the deceased
5Sale of land; sale of buildingExcept Sch II 5(b): under-construction with part-consideration before completion certificate / first occupation IS taxable
6Actionable claimsOnly non-specified ones; specified claims = supply
7–8Non-taxable territory / warehoused goodsOut of Inter syllabus
9Co-insurance premium apportionmentCondition: lead insurer pays full tax on the entire premium
10Reinsurance ceding commissionCondition: reinsurer pays full tax on the gross premium

Composite, mixed and the special cases

Definition

Composite supply [Sec 2(30)]

Two or more taxable supplies, naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business, with one principal supply — taxed at the principal supply’s rate [Sec 8(a)]. Works contract and restaurant service are deemed composite supplies of service by Sch II Para 6, no bundling test needed.

Definition

Mixed supply [Sec 2(74)]

Two or more individual supplies made in conjunction for a single price, which is NOT a composite supply — taxed at the highest rate among the constituents [Sec 8(b)]. Rule out composite FIRST; mixed is the residual category.

Key points
  • Decision order: ALWAYS test composite (naturally bundled?) first; only if that fails, test mixed (single price?).
  • Neither: if items are shown/priced separately on the invoice (even if paid via a single cheque), it is neither composite nor mixed — tax each supply individually (the Dumdum Electronics fact pattern).
  • Vouchers: the transaction in the voucher itself is never a supply — a PPI is “money”, a non-PPI voucher is a non-specified actionable claim (Sch III Para 6). The underlying goods/services on redemption ARE taxable; breakage (unredeemed value) is not; P2P voucher trading (DSA commission) is not taxable, but Principal–Agent commission IS a taxable service.
  • Donations (Circular 116/35/2019): not a supply if all 3 conditions hold — (i) to a charitable organisation, (ii) has the character of a gift/donation, (iii) philanthropic purpose with no commercial gain or advertisement (mere name display ≠ advertisement).
  • Employer–employee: perquisites under the employment contract are not “gifts” — they have a separate non-supply basis.

The three numbers/dates this chapter turns on:

TriggerRuleWhere
₹50,000 per FYEmployer→employee gift threshold — at or below = non-supply, above = supplySch I Para 2 proviso
≥25% shareholding / voting stockThird person controlling both → “related persons”Explanation to Section 15
Completion certificate / first occupation (earlier)Any part-consideration before = taxable service on full value; entire consideration after = sale of building, non-supplySch II Para 5(b) / Sch III Para 5
Common mistakes
  • Testing mixed supply before composite — composite is tested first, mixed is the residual; and separately itemised prices make it neither (tax each supply on its own).
  • Confusing Principal [2(88)] (person in an agency relationship) with principal supply [2(90)] (predominant element of a composite supply) — a classic MCQ trap.
  • Treating the two service-import routes as one — 7(1)(b) needs consideration but no business nexus; Sch I Para 4 needs no consideration but a related person AND business nexus.
  • Tagging hire purchase / sale-or-return as services because of instalment payments — both are Goods (title passes eventually).
  • Mixing up the two employer–employee directions: employee→employer services are always non-supply; employer→employee gifts are non-supply only up to ₹50,000 per FY.
  • Missing the distinct-persons trap — same PAN with separate registrations = supply on stock transfer, but multiple places of business under one GSTIN = not a supply.
  • Ignoring the invoice-name test for agents — Sch I Para 3 applies only when the agent invoices in his own name; disclosing the principal’s name changes nothing.
  • Extending the liquor-licence carve-out to mining rights or spectrum — those have no precedent cover and ARE taxable, usually under RCM.

Quick revision cards

3-parameter test for supply?

Goods/services form + Consideration + course/furtherance of Business — Sch I overrides “no consideration”; 7(1)(b) overrides “no business nexus”.

The 4 paras of Schedule I (BAD-I)?

Business asset transfer (ITC availed) · Agent–Principal (goods only) · Distinct/related persons (₹50,000 gift proviso) · Import of service (related person + business nexus).

Only exception to the business condition?

7(1)(b) — import of services for consideration; taxable even if for personal use.

Composite vs mixed in one line?

Composite = naturally bundled, taxed at principal supply’s rate; mixed = single price, not bundled, taxed at highest rate. Test composite first.

Schedule II Para 6 deems what?

Works contract and restaurant/food service = supply of services, legislatively fixed — no natural-bundling test.

Which actionable claims are taxable?

Only specified ones: betting, casinos, gambling, horse racing, lottery, online money gaming. The rest = Sch III Para 6 non-supply.

Employer→employee gift rule?

Gifts ≤ ₹50,000 per FY = not supply; above ₹50,000 = supply (Sch I Para 2 proviso). Contract perquisites are not gifts.

When is construction taxable?

Any part-consideration before completion certificate/first occupation (earlier) = taxable service; entire consideration after = non-supply sale of building.

Vouchers in one line?

Voucher itself = never a supply (PPI = money; non-PPI = non-specified actionable claim); redemption taxable; breakage not taxable.

Schedule II goods vs services mnemonic?

”Title moves = Goods; only use moves = Services” — hire purchase and sale-or-return are Goods.

Liquor licence by State Govt?

Notified non-supply under 7(2)(b) — unique carve-out; mining rights/spectrum ARE taxable, usually under RCM.

Why does Schedule III always win?

7(2) opens “notwithstanding sub-section (1)” — the negative list overrides everything, so it is the final filter.